Recurring claim

"Jews are the indigenous people of the land — Arabs are the colonizers."

Their strongest version

Jewish historical, religious, and archaeological ties to the land are ancient, continuous, and profound; Jewish presence predates the Arab conquests, and for many Jews the connection to Zion is constitutive of identity.

The response

Don't deny Jewish ties to the land. They are ancient, real — and beside the point being smuggled in. The trick is treating indigeneity as a title deed only one people can hold. Palestinians are not seventh-century arrivals: the region's population has been continuous, adopting new languages and faiths in place, and many Palestinian families descend from those same ancient communities. So the honest picture is two peoples with deep roots in one land — which argues for sharing it, not expelling either. Watch what the claim is for, too: 'they are colonizers' exists to justify removal, which is why the officials who say it pose in front of Greater Israel maps. And in the end, rights in 2026 don't flow from whose ancestor arrived first. They flow from the people who live there now.

Don’t

Never respond by denying or minimizing Jewish historical connection to the land — it's factually wrong and instantly loses every persuadable listener. The counter is 'both, therefore share,' not 'you neither.'
Open in the Sanad app →